|
A review of this Magazine, March 17, 2009
Submitted by: l_koraska70
My son really likes it.
 Not What I expected
A review of this Magazine, February 17, 2009
Submitted by: Lee from Tallahassee, FL
This was offerd as I was checking out with my Maxim subscription so I thought it would be the same type of content as Maxim. My fault though I should have read some reviews or learned more about the magazine instead of just jumping on the "Special" offer.
I'm sure it's a great magazine for it's readers but it's just not for me.
 Too young for my taste
A review of this Magazine, January 20, 2009
Submitted by: Slik from VA
Not a bad magazine but no Maxim or Playboy. It was a little too much advertising for trendy fashion and too little substance.
An Excellent and refreshing guide to the universe
A review of this Magazine, November 26, 2008
Submitted by: TmOney
Mediocre music magazine.
A review of this Magazine, September 20, 2008
Submitted by: Vinny from Pacifica, CA
This magazine has slid downhill from its beginnings. It has a lot of opinions on music, but it never gives multiple opinions from different people on upcoming music. It is just one cd, one review, take it or leave it. It is good for the range of music it covers and how many different cd's it reviews in each magazine. I preferred this magazine when it just started, because its opinions didn't seem to be so arrogant, as it has now become. I prefer hip-hop and I do not disagree with the coverage, it just seems that all the writers in this magazine like rock or somthing else then hip-hop and are force to review or write about it. Besides that it is a mediocre music magazine that needs writers that are involved in all music.
Nice Improvement
A review of this Magazine, September 16, 2008
Submitted by: orval66
I use to get this magazine years ago. It is much better than before.
 Of no interest to anyone over the age of 16
A review of this Magazine, May 5, 2008
Submitted by: DugT
All teenager music
A rather informative and entertaining old and new music roundup
A review of this Magazine, January 10, 2008
Submitted by: LionDude from Mountain View, CA
As Rolling Stone continues its gradual slide into an irrelevant, stale hippie abyss populated with three star album ratings, sloppy political "reporting", paparazzi muck, recycled feature stories on recycled bands, and an overwhelming sense of self-importance, Blender puts the focus (for the most part) where it belongs: the music. A fine mix of both old and new artists, with the drawback being the occasional feature on scantily clad female pop-tarts. Hey, the photos are nice, but let's skip the lip-synchers. Plus the magazine's humor and tongue-in-cheekiness are refreshing and makes for a fun read.
I don't enjoy it at all.
A review of this Magazine, December 14, 2007
Submitted by: nick
Fun music based magazine
A review of this Magazine, December 10, 2007
Submitted by: lexi from raton, nm
3 1/2 stars for Nickelback????
A review of this Magazine, December 10, 2007
Submitted by: John Labut from Grosse Pointe Farms, MI
I loved the recent top 100 indie rock albums of all time. However, a few months prior, a positive review of Nickelback almost turned me off from this magazine for good. Google Nickle back to back and experience how little talent these clowns have. Focus on REAL artists and I'll keep my subscription. Tell me about upcoming blues and jazz artists. Let's talk about talented players and songwriters- John Mayer for instance. I don't care about Hinder and Nickelback and other trash rock garbage that's out there.
A review of this Magazine, December 10, 2007
Submitted by: bodhi0625 from Miami, FL
It is very different from other magazines. I enjoy the attitude that it conveys.
| 
